Kosher Chicken?

Most people today just assume that chicken is a clean bird.  But it was not always this way.  The issue used to be hotly debated between Rabbinics and Karaites.  We will look at some of the positions on this issue and try to see if any of them are true.  But let us look at what Torah says about it first.


^{Vayikra(Leviticus)11:13} And these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray,
¹⁴ And the vulture, and the kite after his kind;
¹⁵ Every raven after his kind;
¹⁶ And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind,
¹⁷ And the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl,
¹⁸ And the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle,
¹⁹ And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.


And again in Devarim


^{Devarim(Deuteronomy11} Of all clean birds ye shall eat.
¹² But these are they of which ye shall not eat: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray,
¹³ And the glede, and the kite, and the vulture after his kind,
¹⁴ And every raven after his kind,
¹⁵ And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind,
¹⁶ The little owl, and the great owl, and the swan,
¹⁷ And the pelican, and the gier eagle, and the cormorant,
¹⁸ And the stork, and the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.
¹⁹ And every creeping thing that flieth is unclean unto you: they shall not be eaten.
²⁰ But of all clean fowls ye may eat.


What some people say is "It seems pretty clear to me.  Chicken is not on the list of unclean birds so it must be clean."  The problem with this position is that because Hebrew was a dead language for so long nobody really knows what birds are listed in the Hebrew text.  These English translations are just guessing as to what birds are listed.  


"Many of the animals on the lists of Lev. 11 are familiar, but it must be stressed that, as with plant and place-names in the Bible, a number of the precise identifications have been lost to us, and educated guesses are in order."  The Schocken Bilbe Volume 1 The Five Books Of Moses page 558


The Stone Edition Tanakh did not even try to translate the names of the birds in these passages, instead choosing to transliterate them and provide some suggestions for the identities of the birds in the footnotes.  Some will also say "because all the birds listed are birds of prey and scavengers this must be what makes a bird unclean."  Again this position has the same problem as the last one.  How can we know that all the birds listed are birds of prey or scavengers when we do not even know what birds they are?  We simply can't know that.  And even if this position was true, it would not help the "chicken is kosher" crowd.  After all chickens are scavengers.  A chicken will gladly eat another dead chicken or any other carcass for that matter.  Also, we should not assume that chicken was not mentioned in the lists of unclean birds. According to a Rabbi Avraham Feld, Anan Ben David one of the founders of Karaism, and his followers believed that chicken was indeed listed as one of the unclean birds in Leviticus.


"Anan and company wrongly translated a term in Leviticus 11:19 as 'chicken' and thereby listed it with impure, non –kosher birds." Karaites-Adversaries of the Redemption, Origin of the Karaites and their Teachings by Avraham Feld


Feld is obviously against the Karaites in almost every way.  And he considers this early Karaite belief to be one of their more offbeat positions.  But is it offbeat?  Sadly he never says why it is wrong, I guess he just wants the reader to trust him and blindly except his authority as a Rabbi.  It is interesting though, that according to Strongs one of the birds listed in Lev 11:19 could be translated as "gallus montanus" in  English a mountain cock.  Our modern chicken is scientificaly called "gallus gallus domesticus" or domestic cock.  So maybe Anan Ben David and the early Karaites were not as far off as Feld would have us believe.  


As for the Rabbinic position, Daniel Frank on page 124 of the book "Jewish Biblical Interpretation and Cultural Exchange: Comparitive Exegesis in Context" says;


"Rabbanite Jews... have always declared the chicken to be a "kosher" bird, even though there are no Scriptural grounds for doing so."


Frank is correct that the Rabbis have pretty much always said that chicken is clean, but he admits that there is no Biblical proof that it is kosher.  Also, according to the Jewish Encyclopedia.com under clean and unclean animals


"It was hard for the rabbinical authorities to distinguish clean from unclean birds, as the Scripture (Lev. xi. 13-19) enumerates only the birds which shall not be eaten, without giving any of the marks which distinguish them from the clean birds. This is all the more important as the names of some of the birds mentioned in the Scriptures are followed by the word "lemino" or "leminehu"—i.e., "after its kind"—and it is therefore necessary to recognize certain fixed distinguishing characteristics. The following rules are fixed by the Talmud, by which a clean bird may be distinguished. It must not be a bird of prey; it must have a front toe, if that be the meaning of ; but according to most explanations the hind toe is meant. Although most birds of prey have the hind toe, the toes of the clean bird are so divided that the three front toes are on one side and the hind toes on the other, while the unclean bird spreads his toes so that two toes are on each side; or if it has five toes, three will be on one side and two on the other (compare Rashi to Ḥul. 59a, and Nissim b. Reuben on the Mishnah to this passage).
The clean birds, furthermore, have craws, and their stomachs have a double skin which can easily be separated. They catch food thrown into the air, but will lay it upon the ground and tear it with their bills before eating it. If a morsel be thrown to an unclean bird it will catch it in the air and swallow it, or it will hold it on the ground with one foot, while tearing off pieces with its bill (Ḥul. 59a, 61a, 63a). As this distinction is not found in Scripture, opinions differed greatly during and since Talmudic times. According to the Talmud (Ḥul. 62a, 63b), only the twenty-four kinds of birds mentioned in Scripture are actually forbidden. If certain birds are positively known as not belonging to these, no further investigation as to characteristic signs is necessary, and they may be eaten. The marks of distinction are laid down only for cases in which there is doubt whether the species is clean or unclean. Authorities, especially in Germany, would only permit the eating of such kinds as have always been eaten (). Accordingly some birds are permitted to be eaten in certain countries, but not in others. There are many controversies in the casuistic literature concerning this matter. Menahem Mendel Krochmal ("Ẓemaḥ Ẓedeḳ," No. 29), for instance, declares the wild goose forbidden, while Eybeschütz ("Kereti u-Peleti," § 82) permits it. When the turkey was brought to Europe Isaiah Horwitz forbade it to be eaten; and although his opinion did not prevail, his descendants refrain from eating it even to-day."


Here we see that the Rabbinic Jews don't know much about what birds are clean and unclean. And the signs that they would look for to determine what birds were clean and unclean are not Scriptural but Talmudic.  This is an important point, Scripture does not give us any physical sign to help identify what birds are clean and what birds are unclean.  We just have a list of forbidden birds.  All clean land animals can be easily identified even if I've never seen said animal before.  It is just a matter of observing the animal's hooves and whether it chews it's cud.  Not so with birds,  we have to know if a bird is on the list of unclean birds in the Torah or not.  We also see that the Rabbis can not even agree with themselves as to what birds are listed.


All of this to say when in doubt don't.  If we can not know if a bird like chicken is unclean or not, do we eat it hoping we are not sinning?  I think not.  We should avoid it until we know that it is clean.  But, let every man be convinced in his own mind.



   

Paul said what?!

To keep or not to keep the Torah?  That is the question.  Most of Christianity today says that the Torah was nailed to the cross.  And some go so far as to say if someone was to keep the Torah (for any reason) that they would be trampling on the blood of Yeshua.  Most of this comes from misunderstanding the letters of Shaul(Paul).  How do I know that the teaching that Shaul said that Believers should not keep the Torah is false?  Easy.  Kepha(Peter) told me.


^{2Kepha(Peter)3:15} And count the patience of our Master as salvation, just as our beloved brother Shaul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, ¹⁶ as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. ¹⁷ You therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability. ¹⁸ But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Master and Savior Yeshua HaMashiach. To him be the glory both now and to the day of eternity. Amen.


The first thing we see in this passage is that our salvation only comes from the patience of Yeshua.  Obviously Kepha is talking about His death on the cross.  Second,  we notice that this is what Shaul was teaching in his letters.  The third thing we see is that there are some things in Shaul's letters that are hard to understand,  which ignorant and unstable people twist to their own destruction,  as they do the other Scriptures.  And finally we see that Kepha warns us how these ignorant people,  are twisting Shaul's writings.  He simply calls them lawless.  Here we have Kepha himself telling us not to listen to people that teach that Shaul taught not to keep the Torah!  Those of you that have discussed this issue with others know that if one can't use Shaul's letters it becomes extremely difficult to defend not keeping the Torah.  Kepha makes it clear that whatever you get out of Shaul's letters you can't get that you do not have to keep the Torah without being ignorant and/or unstable.  Sadly most of Christianity just ignores Kepha's warning,  marching on blindly with Shaul remade into their own image of lawlessness.  There is a saying.  Talk is cheap.  Apparently the Believers in Jerusalem had a similar saying because when they heard rumors spread about Shaul teaching not to keep the Torah they confronted him about it.  And made him put his true belief and teachings into action.

^Acts21:18 And the day following Shaul went in with us unto Yaakov; and all the elders were present.
¹⁹ And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things Elohim had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry.
²⁰ And when they heard it, they glorified YHWH, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the Torah:
²¹ And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moshe, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.
²² What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come.
²³ Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them;
²⁴ Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the Torah.
²⁵ As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.
²⁶ Then Shaul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

Here we see that there were thousands of Jewish believers in Yeshua, and that they ALL were zealous for the Torah.  We also see that there were rumors about Shaul.  Specifically that he was teaching the Jews in the diaspora not to circumcise their sons,  nor to keep the Torah.  Sounds like what most of Christianity teaches today.  Lastly we see that these rumors are false and that Shaul himself keeps the Torah!  He proves his devotion to the Torah by going to the temple and fulfilling a strictly ceremonial aspect of the Torah!  Showing that not just the moral but ceremonial aspects of Torah still apply after the death, burial, resurrection and ascension of Yeshua! And the pouring out of the Ruach HaQodesh!  Now some people admit that this passage proves that the Torah still applies to Believers with Israelite ancestry,  but (because of verse twenty five) they insist that Gentile Believers are different and only those four commands of Torah would apply to them.  By the way three of the four commands are dietary in nature clearly putting them in the ceremonial part of Torah.  If it is true that only these four apply to Gentile Believers,  what about the greatest and second greatest commandments?  Do they not apply to Gentile Believers?  What about murder,  or lying,  or stealing?  If this passage is to be interpreted to mean that only those four commands apply to Gentile Believers what of the ten commandments?  Do they not apply to Gentile Believers?  I know that some do in fact argue that the Shabbat does not apply to Gentile Believers.  Have they never read these passages of Scripture?


^{Shemot(Exodus)20:10} But the seventh day is the Shabbat of YHWH thy Elohim: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:


It's safe to say if a Gentile that is in Yisrael's gates has to keep Shabbat, then a Gentile that has been grafted into the commonwealth of Yisrael itself would have to keep it too.



^{Yeshayahu(Isaiah)66:23} And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Shabbat to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith YHWH.


Notice ALL FLESH shall keep the Shabbat in the thousand year reign of Yeshua.  This is a prophecy of the thousand year reign by the way.  Read the context.


^{Yeshayahu(Isaiah)56:2} Blessed is the man that doeth this, and the son of man that layeth hold on it; that keepeth the Shabbat from polluting it, and keepeth his hand from doing any evil.
³ Neither let the son of the stranger, that hath joined himself to YHWH, speak, saying, YHWH hath utterly separated me from his people: neither let the eunuch say, Behold, I am a dry tree.


^{Yeshayahu56:6} Also the sons of the stranger, that join themselves to YHWH, to serve him, and to love the name of YHWH, to be his servants, every one that keepeth the Shabbat from polluting it, and taketh hold of my covenant;
⁷ Even them will I bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer: their burnt offerings and their sacrifices shall be accepted upon mine altar; for mine house shall be called an house of prayer for all people.


In verse two the phrase "son of man" in Hebrew is "ben adam" which means son of Adam.  So in this verse it says that if a son of Adam keeps the Shabbat he will be blessed.  And look at verse three!  People that say they don't have to keep Shabbat because they as Gentile Believers are "separate" from Yisrael are saying exactly what YHWH told them not to say!  Finally we see in verses six and seven that Gentiles that join themselves to YHWH,  and serve Him,  and love His name,  and take hold of His Covenant,  keep the Shabbat.  And we see what blessings they receive.  Pretty good if you ask me.  So if Shaul really taught that Gentiles don't have to keep Shabbat he disagreed with Moshe, Yeshayahu and even YHWH Himself.  I don't think there is anyway that Shaul would disagree with YHWH or any of His prophets.  So I have only two choices.

1)  Shaul was just painfully ignorant of the Hebrew Scriptures.
or
2)  He did not teach what most of Christianity says he did, regarding Shabbat.

I'm firmly in the second camp.  But getting back to Acts.  It is obvious that there are more commands of Torah that apply to Gentile Believers than just the four mentioned in Acts 21:25.  But which ones?  Again moral vs ceremonial does not work because as I said before three of the four commands from verse twenty five are ceremonial in nature.  Acts 21:25 is talking about a decision made earlier in Acts 15.  Lets look at this passage to see what we can find out.

Acts15:1 And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, and said, Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moshe, ye cannot be saved.

² When therefore Shaul and Barnaba had no small dissension and disputation with them, they determined that Shaul and Barnaba, and certain other of them, should go up to Yerushalaim unto the apostles and elders about this question.
³ And being brought on their way by the church, they passed through Phenice and Samaria, declaring the conversion of the Gentiles: and they caused great joy unto all the brethren.
⁴ And when they were come to Yerusalaim, they were received of the church, and of the apostles and elders, and they declared all things that Elohim had done with them.
⁵ But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the Torah of Moshe.
⁶ And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter.
⁷ And when there had been much disputing, Kepha rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago Elohim made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.
⁸ And Elohim, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Ruach HaQodesh, even as he did unto us;
⁹ And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.
¹⁰ Now therefore why tempt ye Elohim, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?
¹¹ But we believe that through the grace of the Master Yeshua HaMashiach we shall be saved, even as they.
¹² Then all the multitude kept silence, and gave audience to Barnaba and Shaul, declaring what miracles and wonders Elohim had wrought among the Gentiles by them.
¹³ And after they had held their peace, Yaakov answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me:
¹⁴ Shimon hath declared how Elohim at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.
¹⁵ And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written,
¹⁶ After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up:
¹⁷ That the residue of men might seek after YHWH, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith YHWH, who doeth all these things.
¹⁸ Known unto Elohim are all his works from the beginning of the world.
¹⁹ Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to Elohim:
²⁰ But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
²¹ For Moshe of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every sabbath day.
²² Then pleased it the apostles and elders with the whole church, to send chosen men of their own company to Antioch with Shaul and Barnaba; namely, Yehuda surnamed Barsaba and Sila, chief men among the brethren:
²³ And they wrote letters by them after this manner; The apostles and elders and brethren send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia.
²⁴ Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the Torah: to whom we gave no such commandment:
²⁵ It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnaba and Shaul,
²⁶ Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Master Yeshua HaMashiach.
²⁷ We have sent therefore Yehuda and Sila, who shall also tell you the same things by mouth.
²⁸ For it seemed good to the Ruach HaQodesh, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things;
²⁹ That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
³⁰ So when they were dismissed, they came to Antioch: and when they had gathered the multitude together, they delivered the epistle:
³¹ Which when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation.


The first thing we notice is that there were people teaching that the Gentiles had to be circumcised and keep the Torah of Moshe to be saved.  Shaul and Barnaba strongly disagreed with this teaching.  As do I.  So it was decided that They would go to the Apostles and Elders in Yerushalaim for a ruling on the issue.  There Kepha makes the argument that the only way both Jewish and Gentile hearts can be purified is through faith.  And that the only way to be saved is through the grace of the Master Yeshua HaMashiach!  Then Yaakov confirmed that Shimon Kepha was correct.  He then decided that the Gentiles coming to faith should keep these four commands.  But the verse that people tend to skip is verse twenty one.  "For Moshe of old time hath in every city them that preach him, being read in the synagogues every Shabbat day."  Why would Yaakov say that?  He was making the point that the Gentiles coming to faith and that are keeping these four commands will not stop there but will continue to grow and even go to synagogue on Shabbat and learn the rest of the Torah.  This was before Believers in Yeshua were kicked out of the synagogues during the Bar Kokhba revolt.  The issue was never about if Gentile Believers should keep Torah or not.  The issue was do they need to keep the Torah to be saved.  The answer to that question is,  absolutely not!  Some will then ask about circumcision because it was talked about in this passage.  Should a Gentile Believer get circumcised not for salvation but simply out of obedience to YHWH, like Baptism?  I believe yes.  Here are some Scriptures why.

^{Bereshit(Genesis)17:10} This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
¹¹ And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
¹² And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
¹³ He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
¹⁴ And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.

The covenant is everlasting,  and if a Gentile bought with money should be circumcised how much more so an adopted son of Avraham bought with the very blood of Yeshua?


^{Galatians3:29} And if ye be Mashiach's, then you are Avraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


^{Yehezkiel(Ezekiel)44:9} Thus saith the Adonai YHWH; No stranger, uncircumcised in heart, nor uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter into my sanctuary, of any stranger that is among the children of Israel.


This is a prophecy about Yeshua's thousand year reign on Earth.  And it appears that He will be enforcing the Torah of circumcision on any Gentile that wishes to enter His Sanctuary.  So why would I not believe in circumcision for Gentiles?  In summary,  it is a fine line between teaching not to keep Torah period.  And teaching not to keep Torah for Salvation.  It is my belief that Shaul taught the latter,  not the former.

Torah and the Solution to the Palestinian Problem

Everyone it seems has an opinion on how to bring peace to the middle east.  Being a non resister, my view of overcoming the evil of Palestinian terrorism with good is not very popular.  Many would say that Israel defending itself through violence and war cannot be avoided.  Maybe they are right, but if one must go to war, one must go to war the way YHWH commanded us to.  But very few think to ask what the Torah has to say (if anything) about going to war with the Palestinians.  I think it is because most of Christianity could care less what the Torah has to say from a practical application point of view.  And most Jews (being secular) are the same.  Perhaps it is because the Torah is looked at as being to harsh?  But let us be honest, war is harsh!  So, what does the Torah have to say?

^Devarim20:10 When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it.
¹¹ And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee.
¹² And if it will make no peace with thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege it:
¹³ And when YHWH thy Elohim hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword:
¹⁴ But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which YHWH thy Elohim hath given thee.
¹⁵ Thus shalt thou do unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are not of the cities of these nations.

This is the most lenient position the Torah takes on going to war.  And it is only talking about the Nations outside of HaErets(the land).  So a strong argument can be made that the Palestinians, even though they are not Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites or Jebusites should be treated as if they are, because of the fact that they live in the land of our inheritance.

¹⁶ But of the cities of these people, which YHWH thy Elohim doth give thee for an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
¹⁷ But thou shalt utterly destroy them; namely, the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as YHWH thy Elohim hath commanded thee:
¹⁸ That they teach you not to do after all their abominations, which they have done unto their elohim; so should ye sin against YHWH your Elohim.

It does not really matter which option the Israelis choose.  Either one will take care of the Palestinians.  


1a)  They offer peace, and the Palestinians except(not very likely), and become their tributaries and slaves.


1b)  They offer peace, and the Palestinians refuse(very likely), and they kill all their men, and take their women and children as slaves.


2)  They kill everyone without offering peace at all.


This may seem barbaric to modern readers, it certainly sounds barbaric to me.  And then I remember people like the Fogel family and think to myself maybe it would be just treatment.  If you don't know who the Fogel family is just google them and you will see what I mean.  If option two is the one that YHWH wants the Israelis to follow then there is a curse for failing to obey.

^{Bemidbar33:55} But if ye will not drive out the inhabitants of the land from before you; then it shall come to pass, that those which ye let remain of them shall be pricks in your eyes, and thorns in your sides, and shall vex you in the land wherein ye dwell.
⁵⁶ Moreover it shall come to pass, that I shall do unto you, as I thought to do unto them.

This certainly is the case with the Palestinians today.  But will YHWH really cast the Jews out of the land for not driving out the Palestinians as this verse implies?  As it says in the book of Revelation;

^11:2 But the court which is without the temple leave out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.


I guess He will.  

People do not want to do what Yeshua said and turn the other cheek.  And they are not willing to do what Yeshua said through Moshe in the Torah about going to war.  So people end up doing neither.  They would rather do what is right in their own eyes, and do something in the middle.  YHWH forgive our lawlessness! 

Happy Birthday to the Church... or Not!

There is a very popular teaching in Christianity today that says that the Edah(Church) of our Mashiach was born on the Shavuot(Pentecost) after the resurrection of Yeshua, ushering in the age of the Basar(Gospel) and grace.  But is this the case?  I think not.  Shaul says;


Galatians3:8  And the Scripture, foreseeing that Elohim would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the Gospel to Avraham beforehand, [saying], "In you all the nations shall be blessed."

If the Basar was preached to our father Avraham how can the Edah of the Basar have been born two thousand years later?  Yeshua also said;


^{Yochanan(John)8:56} Your father Avraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.
 

So we see that the Basar preached to our father Avraham was indeed the Basar of Yeshua.  And if Avraham believed in the Gospel of Yeshua, would he not be a member of the Church?  What does Steven say?


^Acts7:38 This is he(Moshe), that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sinai, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us:

So we see that Moshe and our fathers were also members of the Church!  If Steven is correct, the Church could not have been born in the first century.  The Edah of Yeshua has been since our father Adam.  The first to be saved by grace through faith!

Rosh Chodesh, a Day of Rest?

Men of Yisrael, is the Rosh Chodesh(New Moon) a day of rest?  Bemidbar(Numbers) 10:10, 28:11-15 is all that I can find in the Torah dealing with the New Moon.  Other than recognizing the day as special and offering special sacrifices there is not a whole lot there.  Of course that does not prove that it is not a day of rest.  After all the Torah never says not to buy and sell on Shabbat either.  At least not that I'm aware.  We get that from Nechemyah10:31.  So, how do the prophets interpret these passages in the Torah regarding Rosh Chodesh?

^Amos8:5 Saying, When will the New Moon be gone, that we may sell corn? and the Shabbat, that we may set forth wheat, making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit?

Here we have a prophet of Elohim saying that people could not wait for the New Moon and Shabbat to be over so that they could sell corn or wheat.  Implying that it was not done in Yisrael not even by dishonest business men.  Some will say that this only applies to Yom Teruah(Day of Trumpets).  Is there any where that says it more plainly?

Yechezkiel(Ezekiel)46:1Thus saith Adonai YHWH; The gate of the inner court that looketh toward the east shall be shut the six working days; but on the Shabbat it shall be opened, and in the day of the New Moon it shall be opened.

Can we come to any other conclusion after reading this passage?  Rosh Chodesh is placed with Shabbat as a non working day of the week!  This is the prophets understanding of the Torah regarding the Rosh Chodesh.  It is a day of rest.

Rabbinic Jews, Salvation and Yeshua

Men of Yisrael(Israel), I'm not a good writer or a scholar, but I feel that I must address this issue the best I can.  What issue? To put it simply, can a Rabbinic Jew be saved without believing in Yeshua?  First I need to define some things.  My definition of Rabbinic Jew is a Jew who denies Yeshua and follows the Oral Torah.  And my definition of saved is being able to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven. 

Again, can a Rabbinic Jew be saved without believing in Yeshua? According to Shaul(Paul) and Barnavah(Barnabas), no.

^Acts13:45 But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Shaul, contradicting and blaspheming.
⁴⁶ Then Shaul and Barnavah waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of Elohim should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.

What did Yeshua say?

^{Yochanan(John)14:6} Yeshua saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.  

Again he says;

^Yochanan8:24 I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am, ye shall die in your sins.

Yeshua also told the Perushim(Pharisees);

^Yochanan8:42 Yeshua said unto them, If Elohim were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from Elohim; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

But are these statements correct?  Will YHWH(Jehovah) really condemn someone for not believing in HaMashiach(the Messiah)?  I think He will.  For it is written;

^{Devarim(Deuteronomy)18:18} I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.
¹⁹ And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which He (Yeshua) shall speak in my name, I will require it of him.

Anyone who does not believe in Yeshua HaMashiach will perish, for it is also written;


^{Tehillim(Psalm)2:12} Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.

^Yochanan3:16 For Elohim so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

It seems clear to me that if one wishes to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven they must submit to the King Messiah who is Yeshua.  I would love to hear your opinions.  Yerushalayim(Jerusalem) Hear the cry of your Mashiach!

^{Mattityahu(Matthew)23:37} O Yerushalayim, Yerushalayim, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!

³⁸ Behold, your house is left unto you desolate.
³⁹ For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of YHWH.

Shalom